Now, you may argue that "well, this is just one small game, that no one is going to play anyway" which may be true, however given that this is a prevailing problem in game development, every bit counts.Īlso, people who aren't straight white men like to play video games, and we like to see non-SWM in games as a matter of seeing both the world in general and ourselves reflected in the thing we enjoy. So, when a huge company decides to not include the option for a relationship option for consenting same-sex partners in a simulation game, while simultaneously including an option for different-sex partners, it reinforces the societal idea that there is one type of acceptable relationship. The stuff surrounding you informs who you are and how you think. Maybe I'm missing something and a silly cartoon character's options represents serious oppression to some people, but I just don't see it.įirst you have to accept the fact that all aspects of popular culture reflect and inform people's lives on an individual and mass level. Maybe they didn't include my particular orientation or race or whatever-totally outrageous! Clear bigotry and discrimination! At any rate, I strongly support same sex marriage, but things like this are just getting ridiculous.
Maybe I'm outraged they don't allow polygamy. "This silly looking cartoon character doesn't meet the politically correct specifications of X Y and Z! What an outrage!" And Nintendo has to bend over and say they're sorry they didn't pander to a specific minority group. Another is that it prevents it by giving some people the ability to enjoy fantasies through a book or cartoon, and not on real children,'' Mr Hosaka said.Īlthough incidence of crime against children in Japan rose last year, the rate remains low.Well I guess we've become a society of massive whiners looking to be outraged at the drop of a hat. ''One view is that sexual drawings of children is a crime. Japanese authorities had carte blanche to crush any kind of expression they didn’t like,” said Hosaka, articulating an attitude shared by some activist Japanese baby boomers who fear the consequences of investing too much power in their rulers again. ''Where will they draw the line? You end up with a situation like the one under the Peace Preservation Law in the years preceding World War II. ''I think there's a real danger in giving police the power and discretion to decide when a drawing of a child is indecent or not,'' Mr Hosaka said.
#Bestiality anime free#
Mere exposure to this kind of thing can do irreparable harm.''īut calls for change have met resistance from many, including former Social Democratic Party member and now government adviser Nobuto Hosaka, who sees them as a threat to free expression. Leading the campaign for tougher laws is UNICEF Japan, which said that ''just because real children aren't depicted in simulated pornography doesn't mean that real damage isn't being done. Activists say police apprehend only a small percentage of perpetrators. Figures released on Thursday showed that police last year took action in a record 935 child pornography cases - an increase of almost 40 per cent on 2008. Along with Russia, Japan is the only G8 country where it is legal to own pornographic images of children, provided people do not intend to sell or distribute them.Įxperts claim the feeble child pornography laws are the reason Japan remains one of the world's biggest suppliers and consumers of illegal images and video content of minors.
#Bestiality anime tv#
In January, a 28-year-old Queensland man became a registered sex-offender after pleading guilty to possessing explicit cartoon images of child TV characters from The Simpsons and The Powerpuff Girls.īut in Japan, child pornography laws introduced in 1999 apply only to photographic or live-action video content of real children, not to manga, anime and video games. Depictions of children in pornographic poses are also banned in Australia.